KL Engineering offers advanced, customized machining and manufacturing solutions streamlining your process and accelerating time-to-market, helping turn your vision into reality with precision and efficiency.

 

Understanding Tolerances: When Precision Adds Cost — and When It Is Justified

Understanding Tolerances

Understanding Tolerances: When Precision Adds Cost — and When It Is Justified

In precision manufacturing, tolerances define the permissible variation in a part’s dimensions and features. While tight tolerances are often associated with quality, specifying more precision than a part functionally requires can significantly increase production costs and lead times. A strategic approach to tolerancing is essential for achieving both technical and commercial objectives.

The Role of Tolerances in Manufacturing

No manufacturing process is capable of producing geometrically exact parts. Tolerances communicate the acceptable deviation from the nominal specification to the manufacturer, ensuring the part will function as intended within its mechanical or structural context.

Tolerances are commonly presented in two forms:

  • Linear Dimensioning With +/- Tolerances (e.g. 1.000 +/- .005 in)
  • Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) controls form, size, orientation and location more concisely.

While tighter tolerances generally require greater process control and can increase complexity and cost, the proper use of GD&T can reduce cost or improve precision compared to linear dimensioning. This is achieved by allowing a clearer definition of functional requirements and enabling more efficient manufacturing and inspection strategies.

Cost Implications of Tight Tolerances

Tighter tolerances increase costs due to several compounding factors:

  • Reduced Machining Efficiency: Slower feeds and speeds are often required to achieve high precision, which reduces throughput.
  • Increased Tooling and Fixturing Requirements: Custom fixturing or specialized cutting tools may be necessary to hold parts within specification.
  • Greater Scrap and Rework Risk: The narrower the acceptable range, the more likely it is that a part will fall outside of spec, particularly in long production runs.
  • Extended Inspection Time and Equipment: Parts with critical tolerances must undergo more rigorous metrology, often requiring CMMs, surface testers, or roundness gauges.
  • Environmental and Process Controls: In some cases, temperature-controlled machining environments and tool-wear compensation (or cutter replacement) become necessary to maintain dimensional accuracy.

The cumulative result is not only increased cost per part, but also longer lead times and potential schedule risk.

When Tight Tolerances Are Justified

There are applications where tight tolerances are essential and directly tied to product performance, including:

  • Interfacing Parts with Press or Slip Fits
  • Bearing Seats and Shaft Journals
  • Sealing Surfaces in Hydraulic or Pneumatic Assemblies
  • Critical Alignment Features in Aerospace and Optical Systems
  • High-Speed Rotating Components Where Balance Is Essential

In these cases, the cost associated with precision is offset by the functional necessity and reliability of the end product.

Common Tolerancing Errors

Engineers sometimes apply unnecessarily tight tolerances by default or due to a lack of feedback from manufacturing teams. The most frequent issues include:

  • Applying unnecessarily restrictive “blanket” profile tolerances across non-critical features & surfaces
    • This has the secondary effect of obscuring design intent, by making it difficult or impossible for the manufacturing team to understand what features are actually important.
  • Using default title block tolerances without considering the actual part function
  • Over-dimensioning symmetrical features or secondary surfaces
  • Misusing GD&T callouts that increase inspection burden without adding value

Such practices often result in increased cost, longer quoting cycles, and delayed manufacturability feedback.

Recommendations for Engineering and Procurement Teams

To ensure tolerances are appropriate and cost-effective, consider the following best practices:

  1. Apply Functional Tolerancing
     Define tolerances based on the specific functional requirement of each feature. Avoid blanket tolerances that do not reflect part usage.

  2. Engage Manufacturing Early
     During the design or prototyping phase, consult with machinists or manufacturing engineers to identify features where tolerances can be relaxed.

  3. Document Critical Features Clearly
     Highlight the most functionally sensitive dimensions and features. Provide context where necessary to support quality planning and inspection.

  4. Consider the Impact on Inspection and QA
     Tight tolerances increase the scope and duration of quality control processes. Ensure your tolerance scheme aligns with inspection capabilities and expectations.

Conclusion

Precision should serve performance, not assumption. Engineers and procurement professionals can make informed decisions that balance functionality with manufacturability by understanding how tolerances influence manufacturing processes and cost.

For teams seeking to optimize designs for production or better align engineering requirements with supplier capabilities, early collaboration with experienced manufacturers is highly recommended.

Let’s Build the Right Solution—Together.

At KL Engineering, capability and flexibility unite to serve one purpose: your goals. We don’t believe in one-size-fits-all. Instead, we tailor every project to fit your unique needs, seamlessly aligning with your processes and priorities. Ready to move forward with a partner who adapts to you? Contact us today to get started on your next project.